[Author Index]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: ergo differences between RS and ST
- Subject: Re: ergo differences between RS and ST
- From: "Ken Mitchell" <ken_mitchell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2000 22:51:50 -0400
>can anyone comment on the ergonomic differences between the
>ST and the RS? are the bars and/or pegs and/or seat set up
>very differently between the two?
I'll bite.
The RS grips are about 1 inch further forward, and 1 inch lower than the ST.
The seat and footpeg positions appear identical. However, it has been
reported that the RS has about an 1 higher rear ride height, affording a
slightly steeper rake angle. The RS is reported to have slightly stiffer
spring rates also.
This all results in the RS having a slightly "sportier" feel. I don't know
that for sure, because no one's ever let me ride their ST. The RS has good
feedback from the front end, and retains light steering effort. Whatever. I
know Jim Karl Gagne can ride his ST every bit as quick as I ride my RS, and
the only differences I could see was that he had his front spring preload
wound in pretty tight, and he chooses to run Michelin Macadam 90X tires, I'm
sticking with my stock Bridgestone BT-020, for now. (if Chaparral *ever*
delivers. Waiting over 3 weeks now, very impatient.)
hth
Ken M.
2000 Sprint RS
(in Spencer MA)
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info
------------------------------
End of st-digest V2000 #478
***************************
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
End of Triumph ST/RS Digest
ST/RS Digest is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info
This digest Copyright 1999-2000 TriumphNet.com