[Author Index]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
RE: [ST] New Daytona
- Subject: RE: [ST] New Daytona
- From: Eric Sheley <Eric@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 23:58:04 -0500
At 11:48 PM 2/20/01 -0500, Joel Ashman wrote:
>IMHO, I'm not digging it. Looks like a Kaw from the front, and a Suzuki
>from the rear. I know that that folks call the ST's looks 'uninspired' or
>'plain' but I never thought that. Unfortunatly, that is what I think of
>when I look at the first pics of the Daytona.
Some better pics are now up at http://www.t5net.com/new-daytona/
>They are trying to hard to be
>like the competion, instead of being better (or different). That is why I
>bought my ST. It is different, and better.
Ditto that.
>Bummer about the rear swing arm too. I hope it doesn't go away on the S3.
>New engine would be nice though!
I would guess that the move is away from the single siders.
- -Eric
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info
=-=-=-= Next Message =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=