[Author Index] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: Subject: [ST] ST vs RS



Both the RS and ST are beauties!

I opted for the ST since it has the hard bag option, single-sided swingarm, 
and reminded me of my R1 a little bit.

Scott


>From: "Darwin Holmstrom" <dholmstrom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Reply-To: ST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>To: <ST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: Re: Subject: [ST] ST vs RS
>Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 09:05:44 -0500
>
> >>> Mal Stainkey <artmgs@xxxxxxxxx> - 7/10/01 8:00 PM >>>
>Subject: [ST] ST vs RS
>They are both great bikes...
>
>I agree. I think it comes down to what you value more: convenience (ST) or 
>sporting ability (RS). Neither Sprint lacks much in either area, but the ST 
>leans a bit more towards convenience (hard bags, more comfortable riding 
>position) and the RS a bit more towards sporting ability (better ground 
>clearance, more agressive riding position). Plus, like Mr. Stainkey said, 
>your personal sense of aesthetics plays a role. I too chose the RS over the 
>ST mostly because I prefered the looks of the RS, even though I really dig 
>hard bags.
>
>
>
>      *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   * 
>   *
>       The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
>           http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
>    http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com


     *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *
      The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
          http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
   http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info

=-=-=-= Next Message =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=