[Author Index]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Subject: [ST] ST vs RS
- Subject: Re: Subject: [ST] ST vs RS
- From: "Scott Inman" <scott__inman@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 13:56:26 -0400
Both the RS and ST are beauties!
I opted for the ST since it has the hard bag option, single-sided swingarm,
and reminded me of my R1 a little bit.
Scott
>From: "Darwin Holmstrom" <dholmstrom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Reply-To: ST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>To: <ST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: Re: Subject: [ST] ST vs RS
>Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 09:05:44 -0500
>
> >>> Mal Stainkey <artmgs@xxxxxxxxx> - 7/10/01 8:00 PM >>>
>Subject: [ST] ST vs RS
>They are both great bikes...
>
>I agree. I think it comes down to what you value more: convenience (ST) or
>sporting ability (RS). Neither Sprint lacks much in either area, but the ST
>leans a bit more towards convenience (hard bags, more comfortable riding
>position) and the RS a bit more towards sporting ability (better ground
>clearance, more agressive riding position). Plus, like Mr. Stainkey said,
>your personal sense of aesthetics plays a role. I too chose the RS over the
>ST mostly because I prefered the looks of the RS, even though I really dig
>hard bags.
>
>
>
> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
> *
> The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
> http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
> http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info
=-=-=-= Next Message =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=