[Author Index]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: [ST] Re: st-digest V2001 #409
- Subject: Re: [ST] Re: st-digest V2001 #409
- From: David Edmondson <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 20:54:50 +0100
on 11/7/01 1:41 PM, David Earl at dlearl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> " what you value more: convenience (ST) or sporting ability (RS)"
>
> I notice a bit in the back of the July Motorcyclist last night, I don't
> have it right here to quote figures but the ST excels in every
> performance figure they quoted: Horsepower, ET/1/4 mile speed, and 60-80
> roll on. IMHO, the conception that an RS is sportier than the ST is an
> illusion, nothing more than ad copy.
> David
> '99ST
>
>
Since they have the same engine and gearing and the RS is lighter this says
more about the testing methodology than anything else.
Dave
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info
=-=-=-= Next Message =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=