[Author Index]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
RE: [ST] Belt drive.
- Subject: RE: [ST] Belt drive.
- From: "Chris Strizver" <strizver@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 12:28:33 -0700
Call me a skeptic. I'd love to get rid of the chain, sprockets, and
maintenance that go along with it. BUT, Triumph put out a real good product,
as we can all agree. I put a lot of trust in that. Having said that, do you
think that Triumph looked at all engineering possibilities and ruled that
the advantages of chain/sprocket outweigh those of a belt? I don't know what
they are, but there has to be some tradeoffs. If I'm wrong, then sure, I'd
be interested in the upgrade but it'd take a lot of convincing to do a major
change like this.
Chris Strizver
'00 Blue ST with oily 'n dirty swingarm, left pannier, lower frame, etc...
Subject: [ST] Belt drive...RE: st-digest V2001 #352
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info
=-=-=-= Next Message =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=