[Author Index] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: [ST] ST vs VFR



I'm really getting sick of this, we're NOT at all biased, the ST is Waaaaaay
better than any silly namby pamby VFwhateveritis and that's all there is to
it. I mean, even my old Buell is better than one of them VF things.

Paul & Dee Agrees
Madd Dawg & Dinky Dawg
1999 Sprint ST
2000 Buell X1

> I'd STRONGLY suggest you ride them both.. I mean this is the ST list
> and we are biased!  If you don't care about things like factory hard
> bags, heated grips, a longer warranty, and most likely MUCH lower
> insurance costs.. well I almost bought a VFR really nice bike but it
> didn't have the available options for long distance and real world
> riding I needed.
>
> Erik
>
>
> >Yes David that was me,
> >
> >I'm thinking of buying a '00 ST or a '01 VFR. What should I do? I
> >like the S in ST
> >more than the T. I will be riding two up with the wife about 50% of the
time.
> >I like power also. I rode a 900 Trophy and thought it was a dog. Any
comments
> >welcome.
> >
> >Possible Future ST owner
> >Robert



     *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *
      The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
          http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
   http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info

=-=-=-= Next Message =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=