[Author Index] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: [ST] was: Mobile Phone flame war - TORCH ON! >> political help



- ----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tom Emberson" <ate_st@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <ST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 3:21 PM
Subject: Re: [ST] was: Mobile Phone flame war - TORCH ON! >> political help


> 
> So let me get this straight. I lived down here for almost 4 years, think
> I know what is going on, but a good old sanity check is in order.
> 
> 
> liberal == democrate == socialist but with out a lot of religeon

I'm afraid to say that you are not right with your equalization. If you will name a liberal person a "socialist w/o a lot of religion" you may run in a state of emergency and a conflict :-)


> 
> conservative == republicans == capitialist == everyone is responsible
> for them selves, less government, the only exception is no euthinasia,
> assisted suicide, abortion, or other means of pain/and suffering relief

I _am_ conservative but I am no capitalist. conservative means to conserve values like intangible assets. To say it in (my) simple English - to be tolerant, to be noble, to respect ethical values a.s.o.
> 
> 
> 
> So then we get to the left and right of each group.
> 
> The left side of the liberals/democrates thinks that 50% income tax
> seems like a good round number.
> 
> Right side of the liberals/democrates thinks that 50% income tax is a
> bit high and will screw up the economy, but we still need a decent set
> of laws to dictate behaviour and of course those lunch programs at
> school must be funded at all costs.
> 
> Where as the left side of the republicans sees the value of those school
> lunch programs and will work to get the ones in there state funded.
> 
> And of course the right side of the republicans/conservatives honestly
> believe that if you could not afford the kid's lunch, you should not
> have had the kid in the first place, anyway all the budget should go to
> the military.
> 
> 
> Does that sound right???

I'm afraid to have to say "NO".

> 
> Tom

Enrico


> 
> On Fri, 5 Apr 2002, Ben Snyder wrote:
> 
> > > I can't believe it... most of the people of the USA
> > > I know are liberal. Why thus can't anyone use its
> > > cellphone if he wants? Everyone is nevertheless
> > > responsible for itself...
> > > Why thus do some people believe to have to behave
> > > themself like teachers who speak with stupid
> > > children?
> > 
> > Are you *sure* they are liberals?  This doesnt sound
> > like the liberals I know.  Most liberals are the types
> > that try to make others responsible for their own
> > mistakes (like taking McDonald's to court for serving
> > hot coffee that you spill in your lap).  Most
> > liberals' favorite phrase is either, 'there oughtta be
> > a law,' or, 'do it for the children.'
> > These are the people who want to sue Sony because
> > their kid played everquest and then killed himself,
> > even though he had a known mental condition
> > (depression I think) that has been known to lead to
> > suicide.  They are the people who get drunk, drive
> > home, wreck and sue the bar - afterall, according to
> > the liberals, they are the one that are supposed to
> > know *your* limits, know that you dont have a ride
> > waiting outside, decide if you should have one more. 
> > In the US we are allowed to sue for anything, but it's
> > the liberal courts that allow these people to win.
> > 
> > So to think that most people you know in the US are
> > liberals, but that they think everyone is responsible
> > for themselves is somewhat contradictory in my experience.
> > 
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax
> > http://taxes.yahoo.com/
> > 
> >      *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *
> >       The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
> >           http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
> >    http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info
> > 
> 
> 
> /*************************************************************
>  Thomas Emberson
>  '01 BRG Sprint ST (last count 12 months old, 16,650 miles)
>  sold: '98 ZX6e, '99 ZX9r, '95 EX500
> *************************************************************/
> 
> 
>      *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *
>       The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
>           http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
>    http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info
> 

     *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *
      The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
          http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
   http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info

=-=-=-= Next Message =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

End of st-digest V2002 #194
***************************


 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

                      End of Triumph ST/RS Digest
            ST/RS Digest is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
          http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
   http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info

          This digest Copyright 1999-2002 TriumphNet.com