Re: [ST] Race Tech and Progressive Fork Springs

["George Cope" <gcope@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks to David E, Dan W and Brian D for the help.  I knew your guys were
out there somewhere.  I will call Race Tech on Monday when they re-open.  I
think I would prefer to but the Race Tech springs, assuming a better match
to the emulators.

Did anyone else catch the Frank Zappa song reference in the Brian's
suggested weblink? (http://www.dynamohumm.com/)

Dan, my man, a part number.  Can't thank you enough.

George Cope
Roseville, CA
'99 ST Black
10,200 miles, 200 today and cool...

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "David Earl" <dlearl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <ST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2003 6:00 PM
Subject: [ST] Race Tech and Progressive Fork Springs


> I would call the (800) number and talk to a person.  Race Tech definitely
has springs for the ST.  I have a pair in mine.
> I wouldn't recomend using progressive springs with the emulators.
> IMO, progressive springs are kind of like dual sport bikes.  In order to
get the added capability, sacrifices have to be made in the primary
function.  The emulators are so much better at doing what "progressive"
springs do (somewhat poorly) heving both would only degrade the suspension.
> My 2c
>
> David
> '99ST
>
>      *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *
*
>       The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
>           http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
>    http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info
>
>


     *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *
      The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
          http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
   http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info

=-=-=-= Next Message =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=