[Author Index]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: [ST] 999
- Subject: Re: [ST] 999
- From: Charlie McCullough <cmccull@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2003 09:27:53 -0500
At 08:45 AM 1/16/03, Steven Kohlscheen wrote:
>I'm quite pleased they decided to "start over" with different styling on the
>999. There are always going to be those that will resist the new. Witness
>the uproar in the BMW community when the K bikes came out. I have finally
>seen the 999 in person, and I do like it. I won't own one, but I like it's
>looks.
I don't have a problem with Ducati (or anyone else) "starting over"
w/something new. The 916/748 was a "starting over" (from the previous
851/888 SBK's) and there were few/no complaints about the looks that I
recall. Tamburini's creation was an acclaimed "masterpiece" from the moment
it was first unveiled.
But if you're going to "start over", it ought to be something better than
butt ugly. I've had Ducs for years. Various ones dating back to the 80's.
But I won't be getting one of these new stylistic nightmares.
I have a friend (fellow longtime Ducati owner) that, after much debate went
and put his money down on a 749S and is waiting for delivery. I was unable
to talk him out of it. I feel like I've let him down somehow........
They're ugly. Butt Ugly. An abomination. An affront to the senses and
mind-numbingly bereft of any aesthetic value.
(I feel better now). :-)
Charlie McCullough
tz250 WERA#90
Duc 748
Triumph ST
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info
=-=-=-= Next Message =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=