[Author Index] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: [ST] CF Can



I will concur that there is about a 10-11 pound different between the stock
can and the Triumph CF as I weighed them when I did the CF install.

Speaking of which, I do have a stock can around if anyone is interested in
buying it.

Eric Mann
RAT Member #117196
Rennlist Member # 030218-2755
eric91z@xxxxxxxxx
'01 Triumph Sprint ST
'95 Ford F-150 4x4
- ----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ken Mitchell" <kp.mitchell@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <ST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2003 4:42 PM
Subject: RE: [ST] CF Can


> I do know for sure the CF can is lighter than stock, by about 11 lbs
(5kg),
> and I like the sound better. I don't know the construction, as I'm not
> cutting mine up to see. As for fuel usage, I don't know for certain what
> tune level is loaded in my bike's ECM, but to my surprise, performance
> improved and fuel economy did NOT go down. Still getting 48-50mpg, and I
> ride it moderate-aggressively.
>
> Ken Mitchell
> Spencer MA USA
> '00 RS
>
>
>
>
>      *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *
*
>       The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
>           http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
>    http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info


     *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *
      The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
          http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
   http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info

=-=-=-= Next Message =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=