[Author Index]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: [ST] Penske Shock longer than stock....potential problems?
- Subject: Re: [ST] Penske Shock longer than stock....potential problems?
- From: Bryce <bster13@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 14:09:07 -0700 (PDT)
Thanks Garry. I've come to that conclusion also.
Only thing I lose is the time it takes to install and
reinstall and 5 bucks shipping. I'll give it a whirl,
just checking to see if there is really wrong with my
368mm eye-to-eye in the first place.
Thanks,
Bryce
- --- garrysimmons@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> You've spent a big pile o' dead presidents to get
> that shock. If you use it as is, you may be thrilled
> with it and maybe even adjust in MORE length. Who
> knows? But you'll never have the option of going
> back to the stock length.
>
> If Penske is willing to let you return the shock to
> be fixed/whatever (on their dime) AFTER using it at
> 368mm for a while, then maybe it's worth bolting the
> 368 version on.
>
> Garry
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Photos: High-quality 4x6 digital prints for 25¢
http://photos.yahoo.com/ph/print_splash
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info
=-=-=-= Next Message =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=