[Author Index]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: [ST] Sprocket
- Subject: Re: [ST] Sprocket
- From: JAU149@xxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2004 15:24:23 -0400
Thanks for all the good sprocket info , guys. I think I will go with the OEM. Next question....My 02RS comes stock with a 19 tooth up front ( I Think ....I havent pulled the cover to check yet ). Should I be looking at an 18 or a 17 tooth to replace it ?
Thanks,
John
In a message dated 7/9/2004 1:10:25 PM Eastern Daylight Time, "Welsh, Jay (GEAE)" <jay.welsh@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>Hey,
>
>I'm gonna have to side with my friend Ken here.
>
>In addition, Triumph has an engineering department that focuses on things
>like vibe damping, High and Low cycle fatigue and material strength and wear
>properties. While they are cost conscious they are also "warranty claim
>conscious". I would imagine that if they added a post process (vibe damper
>is cast on to the sprocket) to the manufacture of such a seemingly simple
>stamped part, It is not simply to be able to charge you more, it is
>probably to move some vibe excitation point out of the operating range of
>the vibe signature of the bike.
>
>You may not feel the excitation with the stock sprocket in place but I bet
>it is back smack where they didn't want it for whatever reason they chose.
>
>for the few extra dollars the stock sprocket cost I would think that the
>longer tranny life or longer sprocket life or whatever they were working
>around is probably worth it.\
>
>Just my two cents.
>
>Jay
>'00 ST
>'00 KTM LC4 (you want to talk about vibes?)
>'01 XR650
>
>
>Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2004 01:38:32 -0400
>From: "Ken Mitchell" <kp.mitchell@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: RE: [ST] Re: Front Sprockets....
>
>Given the miles I get out of OEM quality parts, I see no justification in
>trying to save a couple of dollars. I know for sure when I go to bolt them
>on, they fit. When a friend tried bits from Sprocket Specialists, the front
>one was obviously VERY cheaply made and fit loosely. The rear was worse, and
>fit too tight, I had to alter the wheel to fit the slightly out-of-round
>steel sprocket on.
>
>I'm the same way with brake pads, though not with tires. ;)
>
>To each his/her own.
>
>Ken M.
>'00 RS
>
>- -----Original Message-----
>From: Rupert Galea
>Subject: RE: [ST] Re: Front Sprockets....
>
>> >The Triumph part has a 'window' with a stiff plastic-looking 'pane'
>> >in it, said to absorb shocks.
>> >However I went with Lilley's pattern part when I did the change to 18
>> >about 2 years ago,
>>
>> Thanks for the info Barry...what is a Lilley's pattern part ?
>
>When I replaced my front sprocket I could not justify the extra cost for a
>Triumph part. Does the Lilley part have the plastic? I swear I can feel
>extra vibration.
>Rupert
>
>
> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
> The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
> http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
> http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info
>
>
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info
=-=-=-= Next Message =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=