[Author Index] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: [ST] Honda CBR1000 HP



Did anyone read the S4 test and the reason they didn't include it in the 
600cc naked test.  Because it was so much better!!! ---  I guess Triumph 
wouldn't be allowed to kick ass if they don't spend enough ad $$ :-)

Dave Bardell
MillerSTown, PA


Bare wrote:

> The new Motorcyclist has the first test on the new CBR1000. 153.5 hp 
> vs Gixxers 152.1. Pretty much a wash, but the test indicates the CBR 
> will be the faster bike, better handling, more tractable power, etc. I 
> guess we'll get a hint tomorrow.
> Obviously the 180 hp on the R-1 is crankshaft hp, or factory claims. 
> Anyone who believes factory horsepower or weight claims doesn't have 
> much a a connection to the real world!
>
> Bare
>
>
>
>     *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   
> *   *   *
>      The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
>          http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
>   http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info
>
>



     *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *
      The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
          http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
   http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info

=-=-=-= Next Message =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=