[Author Index]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: [ST] Honda CBR1000 HP
- Subject: Re: [ST] Honda CBR1000 HP
- From: Dave Bardell <dbardell@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2004 10:27:08 -0500
Did anyone read the S4 test and the reason they didn't include it in the
600cc naked test. Because it was so much better!!! --- I guess Triumph
wouldn't be allowed to kick ass if they don't spend enough ad $$ :-)
Dave Bardell
MillerSTown, PA
Bare wrote:
> The new Motorcyclist has the first test on the new CBR1000. 153.5 hp
> vs Gixxers 152.1. Pretty much a wash, but the test indicates the CBR
> will be the faster bike, better handling, more tractable power, etc. I
> guess we'll get a hint tomorrow.
> Obviously the 180 hp on the R-1 is crankshaft hp, or factory claims.
> Anyone who believes factory horsepower or weight claims doesn't have
> much a a connection to the real world!
>
> Bare
>
>
>
> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
> * * *
> The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
> http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
> http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info
>
>
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info
=-=-=-= Next Message =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=