[Author Index]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
RE: [ST] Valve Shim Replacement - Another Perspective [was:Crankstory continues...]
- Subject: RE: [ST] Valve Shim Replacement - Another Perspective [was:Crankstory continues...]
- From: "Adrian Mansell" <amansell@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 19:34:44 +0100
Can anyone explain to me why shim-under-bucket is better than shim-over-bucket?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: st-triumphnet.com-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:st-triumphnet.com-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On
> Behalf Of Rick
> & Joyce
> Sent: 25 April 2005 19:25
> To: ST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [ST] Valve Shim Replacement - Another Perspective
> [was:Crankstory continues...]
>
>
> This conversation applies to first-generation 955i and earlier 885
> shim-OVER-bucket engines. For our purposes, that's the '01 and
> earlier ST/RS. For multi Triumph owners, my recollection is the '01
> Tiger and Daytona were the first models to get the second-generation
> 955i, shim-under-bucket engine as fitted to the ST/RS in '02.
_______________________________________________
Triumph Sprint ST/RS mailing list
Send list posts to ST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Change your list options at www.TriumphNet.com