Unfortunately, I can't see that happening. <snip> IMHO, the real reason the RS existed was not as something in between the Daytona and the ST (even though it sort of fell in that way), but rather as a semi-naked offering for those who are not into full fairing work.
Matt Heyer
On 8/25/05, Chris Harwood <Chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Marc
Sounds good to me. I'll wait.
Chris Harwood
00 RS
MarcVE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 25/08/2005 08:33:37 >>>
Seems pretty clear to me that the Triumph marketing guys are missing
something here.
Lost of people on this list (myself included) seem to want something a
bit sportier and lighter than the ST1050.
Those same people are hesitating at buying a Gixer/R1/ZX etc, so the
new Daytona probably also wont appeal to them.
What's needed (IMHO) is an RS with the 1050 motor tuned for more HP,
less weight and a better adjustable suspension.
cheers
<<<<<<
_______________________________________________
Triumph Sprint ST/RS mailing list
Send list posts to ST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Change your list options at www.Triumphnet.com
_______________________________________________
Triumph Sprint ST/RS mailing list
Send list posts to ST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Change your list options at www.Triumphnet.com