RE: [ST] What are the non-cosmetic differences between RS and ST?

["Heyer, Matthew A." <mheyer@xxxxxxxxx>]

UH OH!!!!!  Not a tire thread!!!!  Let's stay on subject boys; that is,
what tires did the RS vs the ST come with.  You can obviously put
anything you want on there...

Matt Heyer


- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-st@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-st@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Gavin Lawrie
Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 12:42 PM
To: ST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ST] What are the non-cosmetic differences between RS and
ST?

On 1 Feb 2005, at 11:24, simonb wrote:

> It would be interesting to know what tyres where fitted to both bikes.
> For me this makes one of the biggest differences in how a bike
handles.

My ST has BT020's (about 3.5K miles used so far), the RS had BT57s 
presumably from new, so about same mileage.  My ST had BT57s on too 
when I first got it, and I found handling improved when I put the 020s 
on.  But based on what I've read in this forum and elsewhere, I suspect 
I'll switch to Avon Azarro ST's when I next put new tyres on.

Best regards

Gavin Lawrie
ST'03


     *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *
*   *
      The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
          http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
   http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info



     *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *
      The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
          http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
   http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info

=-=-=-= Next Message =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=