[Author Index]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[ST] What are the non-cosmetic differences between RS and ST?
- Subject: [ST] What are the non-cosmetic differences between RS and ST?
- From: Gavin Lawrie <gavin.lawrie@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 00:20:12 +0000
Hi
Partly in the hope of dragging focus of list back to bikes... the
question about differences between RS and ST. I had my ST get its 12K
service from Jack Lilley today (came back feeling like a 'new' bike -
not sure what they did but it really made a positive difference - but
glad it did as service was very expensive!) and they loaned me an '04
RS. I've not been on an RS for a while, and so it was good to be able
to do a back-to-back comparsion of the two bikes: I got to do basically
the same 30 mile mixed road route four times today - out and back on ST
and back and out on RS. What surprised me was that they feel so
different to ride - but I can't work out how or why. The RS felt
lighter, and narrower, I rode it lower in the corners and found myself
riding it one gear lower on the same roads. It also had the stock seat
- - which I found much less comfortable than the Triumph gel seat on my
ST. But I had forgotten how good the instruments on the RS are
compared to the ST. Anyhow - hence the question: I had assumed until
now that they were mechanically identical, varying only in the faring /
centre stand etc. Are there other differences - or am I just
hallucinating?
Best regards
Gavin Lawrie
ST'03
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info
=-=-=-= Next Message =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=