[Author Index]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: [ST] I stand corrected.....
- Subject: Re: [ST] I stand corrected.....
- From: John Ulizzi <jaulizzi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 15:05:30 -0700 (PDT)
--- Eoin Kirwan <eoinkirwan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thursday 15 June 2006 14:18, John Ulizzi wrote:
> > My only point is that it would
> > be unfair to the driver of the car for the court
> or
> > anyone else to additionallly penalize her
> personally
> > for the additional injurys the biker sustained
> because
> > he was a) on a bike, and/or b) riding without a
> > helmet.
>
> There is logic to the suggestion that we should
> punish the misdeed, not the
> consequences of the misdeed (which often depend
> largely on luck.) However
> that's not the way the court system works in
> practice over here and I'm
> pretty sure it doesn't in the US either...
Now THAT we can absolutley agree on....
>
> Example:
>
> Driver backing into a parking space, tired,
> distracted, on the phone,
> whatever, but not concentrating sufficiently - goes
> too far and mounts the
> kerb - hits nothing - no cops around - no damage to
> car - drives off with no
> consequence.
>
> Same driver, same incident - hits a parked car,
> nobody injured. Insurance
> takes a hit, slight possibility of being charged
> with careless driving (slap
> on wrist.)
>
> Same driver, same incident - except a small child
> happens to be standing on
> that pavement...
>
> The driver makes exactly the same mistake, but the
> consequences are very
> different. The parents would argue that it would be
> unjust if killing a child
> was treated the same by the legal system as
> scratching a bumper. The driver
> could argue that it's not their fault the child
> happened to be standing there
> when they made a simple mistake, but as a person in
> charge of a vehicle
> they're responsible.
>
> The point I'm trying to make is that drivers have to
> share the roads with more
> vulnerable road users - smaller cars, older cars
> with poor protection,
> bicycles, pedestrians, motorcycles. That's part of
> the deal. If they don't
> like it they shouldn't drive. Or, better, keep extra
> alert for those who
> don't benefit from six airbags and a steel cage.
Cant argue that either... very well put.
>
>
> > I guess the bottom line, if you are riding a bike,
> is
> > to always think as though every other vehicle is
> > trying to kill you.
>
> I can't disagree on that one.
I told ya were on the same page ....
:-)
>
>
> Eoin
>
> _______________________________________________
> Triumph Sprint ST/RS mailing list
> Send list posts to ST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Change your list options at www.Triumphnet.com
>
_______________________________________________
Triumph Sprint ST/RS mailing list
Send list posts to ST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Change your list options at www.Triumphnet.com