Re: [ST] Wrap-up of Roethlis-what-his-name?

[Steve Lawler <slawler@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

In a previous email, Matt Knowles stated:

> On Jun 19, 2006, at 5:24 PM, Sprint ST wrote:
>>I've seen some strange twists and explanations of physics on this site 
>>and
>>it looks like we're going into another case of strange science. 
> 
> 
> Well it's been 27 years since I took a physics class. I guess I'm going 
> to have to look up momentum vs. inertia.


How about if we just put this whole thing to rest by agreeing that 
Rothlisberger was a victim of Newtons' First Law of Motion?

A body at rest remains at rest and a body in motion continues to move at 
a constant velocity unless acted upon by an external force.

-- 
Steve Lawler
Verona, NJ, USA

2001 Sprint ST "Blue Devil"

"Fig Newton: The force required to accelerate a fig 39.37 inches per 
second."
             -- J. Hart
_______________________________________________
Triumph Sprint ST/RS mailing list
Send list posts to ST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Change your list options at www.Triumphnet.com