Re: [ST] Helmet laws ( Was Wrap Up )

[<dbardell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Matt,

This makes way too much sense - try getting it past the 
lawyers/politicians.
Love the idea though- same as high performance cars/bikes 
that have high accidents rates- the higher the 
performance/crash rate - the higher the premium.

At least fairer than the present situation.

Dave

On Thu, 22 Jun 2006 09:14:56 -0700
  Matt Knowles <matt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>I've always thought it should work like this:
>
>1. There would be no helmet laws.
>
>2. When you go to buy insurance, they ask you, "Would 
>that be a helmet, 
>or no helmet policy?" and charge you accordingly.
>
>3. If you sign up for a helmet policy and crash with out 
>one, your 
>insurance company has the option of declining to pay for 
>any injuries, 
>head related or not.
>
>I don't want to force anyone to wear one, but I don't 
>want my insurance 
>premiums supporting stupid people either.
>
_______________________________________________
Triumph Sprint ST/RS mailing list
Send list posts to ST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Change your list options at www.Triumphnet.com