[Author Index]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: [St] Aluminum or Steel...
- Subject: Re: [St] Aluminum or Steel...
- From: John Ulizzi <jaulizzi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 14:39:40 -0800 (PST)
Havent you been paying attention to this thread? I did this to the Superhawk, and it shortened the wheelbase, making the bike more flickable. Since the RS is longer to begin with, and I will be in a place where flickable is good, I thought I would try the same thing...I have no interest in an Aluminum rear sprocket, my stealer says that is all he can get...
J.G.
--- On Fri, 12/19/08, Bil Swartz <bil@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Bil Swartz <bil@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [St] Aluminum or Steel...
To: ST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Friday, December 19, 2008, 11:41 AM
John Ulizzi wrote:
> I am trying to source a 45 tooth rear sprocket for my soon to be 01 RS.
IIRC my ST's OEM sprocket was a Sunstar, which is what I replaced it with
(steel) for longer life.
Sure, "aluminium" reduces unsprung weight but we're talking
street bikes here.
I sourced all my replacement chains and sprox at MotorCycleOnlineStore.com last
time around. JT for the front and Sunstar for the rear. Mention your HSTA
membership for a discount.
Now why would you go up 2 in the back rather than dropping one or two in the
front? Seems easier to me w/o risk of needing another link in the chain, etc.
--
._O_. '03 Sprint ST
-Bil- /_\o/_\ '98 Thunderbird Sport
/~\
"No I don't want a pickle..." /H\ '98 VFR800FI -hers
ASCII \ / Against
bil@xxxxxxxxxx (=O=) '89 Hawk GT -hers Ribbon X HTML
"Drink Real Ale" "Quch!" 66 U AMA,CMHmoto,HSTA!
Campaign / \ Mail
_______________________________________________
Triumph Sprint ST/RS mailing list
Send list posts to ST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Change your list options at www.Triumphnet.com
_______________________________________________
Triumph Sprint ST/RS mailing list
Send list posts to ST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Change your list options at www.Triumphnet.com