Re: [ST] Emulator question

["Jeremy Witt" <jeremyw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Yes, that is true.  Some clever person figured out a straightened-out
coat hanger with a sideways "hook" bent into the end can be used to fish
the emulators out of mounted forks for readjustment.  

In my experience, even poorly adjusted emulators greatly improved
things.  Granted I haven't dialed them in perfectly, but my second
attempt made the front end feel a LOT better, and that was good enough.
This is on the old Hawk, but the front end bits are just about the same.


Jeremy Witt
Field Engineer
Corrugated Networking Services Inc.
Office: 603-703-0365



-----Original Message-----
From: st-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:st-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jack Hays
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 9:10 AM
To: st-triumphnet.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
st-triumphnet.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ST] Emulator question

It was written: An emulator gives you independent control over both the
compression and rebound settings on the front forks.

I have not used them and one reason is that I understand that every time
you want to change settings you have to remove the forks and springs
again
to get to the emulators. True or false? If so, that seems like a lot of
work to me to try and get it right. And if you use their recommendations
are you just happy with better without experimenting?



Jack Hays
972-952-5065
"I'll see you on the dark side of the Moon"
Que Lastima
4 - 8 - 15 - 16 - 23 - 42

_______________________________________________
Triumph Sprint ST/RS mailing list
Send list posts to ST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Change your list options at www.Triumphnet.com


_______________________________________________
Triumph Sprint ST/RS mailing list
Send list posts to ST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Change your list options at www.Triumphnet.com